Tuesday, June 21, 2011

U.S. GAO - Compact of Free Association: Proposed U.S. Assistance to Palau and Its Likely Impact

This June 16, 2011 GAO report shows clearly the financial support Congress provides Palau under their Compact of Free Association. When the PPD proposes a Compact of Association for Puerto Rico, they have no idea the rotten deal Congress will give back to Puerto Rico.MJ

U.S. GAO - Compact of Free Association: Proposed U.S. Assistance to Palau and Its Likely Impact
GAO-11-559T June 16, 2011

Highlights Page (PDF) Full Report (PDF, 25 pages) Accessible Text

Summary

The Compact of Free Association between the United States and the Republic of Palau, which entered into force in 1994, provided for several types of assistance aimed at promoting Palau's self-sufficiency and economic advancement. Included were 15 years of direct assistance to the Palau government; contributions to a trust fund meant to provide Palau $15 million each year from 2010 through 2044; construction of a road system, known as the Compact Road; and federal services such as postal, weather, and aviation. U.S. agencies also provided discretionary federal programs related to health, education, and infrastructure. In 2008, GAO projected total assistance from 1994 though 2009 would exceed $852 million. In September 2010, the United States and Palau signed an agreement (the Agreement) that would, among other things, provide for additional assistance to Palau and modify its trust fund. This statement describes (1) the Agreement's provisions for economic assistance to Palau, (2) its impact on the trust fund's likelihood of sustaining scheduled payments through 2044, and (3) the projected role of U.S. assistance in Palau government revenues. GAO reviewed the Agreement; examined Palau's recent single audit reports and budget projections; and assessed trust fund balances and disbursement plans under various assumptions and investment returns.
The Agreement would provide steadily decreasing assistance totaling approximately $215 million from 2011 through 2024. This would include the following: (1) direct economic assistance ($107.5 million) for government operations, (2) infrastructure project grants ($40 million) to build mutually agreed projects, (3) infrastructure maintenance fund ($28 million) for maintaining the Compact Road, Palau's primary airport, and certain other major U.S.- funded projects, (4) fiscal consolidation fund ($10 million) to assist Palau in debt reduction, and (5) trust fund contributions ($30.25 million) in addition to the $70 million contributed under the compact. Under the Agreement, the United States would contribute to the trust fund from 2013 through 2023, and Palau would delay its withdrawals by $89 million from 2010 through 2023. GAO projects that with these changes the fund would have a 90 percent likelihood of sustaining payments through 2044, versus 25 percent without these changes. Estimates prepared for the Palau government project declining reliance on U.S. assistance under the Agreement--from 28 percent of government revenue in 2011 to under 2 percent in 2024--and growing reliance on trust fund withdrawals and domestic revenues. The estimates show trust fund withdrawals rising from 5 percent to 24 percent, and domestic revenues rising from 40 to 59 percent, of total government revenue. According to the estimates, U.S. assistance from 2011 though 2024 would total $427 million, with discretionary federal programs accounting for about half of that amount.

4 comments:

  1. Does promoting this status in the island never tell what Puerto Rico will give the USA to obtain all does benefits they want under free association, federal funds, citizenship, etc. All nation work for their national interest, there is no mother Teresa in international affairs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Compacts or Treaties are ONLY made between Independent, Sovereign Nations.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I appreciate your comments. The people in Puerto Rico need to be informed.
    MJ

    ReplyDelete
  4. Still, some people would be better off, like those who would like to pay less than the minimum wage, get rid of environmental laws, avoid expensive litigation for violations of civil rights or equal employment opportunities, etc. Citizenship is not important to rich people. When you have the money social injustice is beyond the point and you can go live where you please.

    ReplyDelete